- When This Judgment Becomes a Problem
- How Systems That Don’t Record Failures Are Created
- Designs Where Only Successes Remain
- Failures Are Handled as Individual Events
- No Incentive to Record Exists
- What Happens When Failures Aren’t Recorded
- The Same Types of Failures Are Repeated
- Decision-Making Assumptions Are Not Updated
- Superficial Stability Masks Internal Decay
- Why “Not Recording Seems Safer”
- The Point Where Failures Become Irreversible
- Questions to Rethink This Judgment
When This Judgment Becomes a Problem
When systems and workflows are well-established, procedures are running, numbers are being reported, and no major issues are visible on the surface, there is a tendency to implicitly assume that “there are no problems,” “failures have already been resolved,” or “there’s no need to dig deeper.” However, what might actually be happening is not that failures have disappeared, but simply that they are no longer being recorded.
How Systems That Don’t Record Failures Are Created
Many organizations unintentionally have structures that prevent failures from being recorded.
Designs Where Only Successes Remain
When only success stories and achievement metrics are managed, while shortcomings, rework, and exceptions are erased as “already handled,” crucial information that forms the basis for management decisions is lost. The system retains no record of what went wrong or why assumptions were off.
Failures Are Handled as Individual Events
Mistakes are sometimes resolved through individual, ad-hoc responses, with root cause analysis ending at a personal level. Consequently, failures are treated as isolated incidents rather than structural organizational issues, preventing them from leading to process improvements.
No Incentive to Record Exists
When recording a failure leads to a lower evaluation or when nothing changes even if it is recorded, there is no reason to be honest. The rational choice becomes not to document failures, causing the organization to lose valuable learning opportunities.
What Happens When Failures Aren’t Recorded
The Same Types of Failures Are Repeated
With no access to past failures, each one is treated as a “first-time problem.” Learning remains with individuals and is not accumulated by the organization, leading to a continuous waste of precious resources for SMEs.
Decision-Making Assumptions Are Not Updated
When the fact that an assumption was wrong is not preserved, decision-making becomes fixed on a premise of success. This results in continued decisions based on assumptions that are out of sync with reality, making reversible management judgments difficult.
Superficial Stability Masks Internal Decay
Problems become invisible, but the organization’s ability to correct itself declines. In this state, only major failures are likely to suddenly surface, making the response at that point much more difficult.
Why “Not Recording Seems Safer”
In the short term, the decision not to document failures seems rational—it avoids rocking the boat, saves on explanation costs, and prevents accountability issues. However, the trade-off is the quiet progression of a structure that loses the very material needed to update judgments. This is a risk that undermines the foundations of delegation and organizational design.
The Point Where Failures Become Irreversible
Failures turn from potential lessons into organizational weaknesses in the following situations:
- Failures depend on individual memory, not recorded data.
- Even if records exist, they are not referenced in daily operations or decision-making.
- Even when recorded, they are not reflected in subsequent management decisions or business processes.
In these cases, failures physically exist but are absent from decision-making, becoming an “irreversible” liability.
Questions to Rethink This Judgment
To achieve reversible management decisions, ask your company the following questions:
- Where is the most recent failure recorded?
- Is that record accessible for the next decision?
- Is your system designed with greater risk or greater benefit in recording failures?
- Are recorded failures successfully updating the assumptions behind your decisions?
If you cannot answer these, the problem likely lies not in the number of failures, but in the very system design that prevents failures from informing organizational judgment. For the sustainable growth of an SME, designing a “learning organization” that learns from failures and applies those lessons to future actions is essential.


Comments